June 20, 2005

spammers

Yeah... they're back again. They're ALL a pain in the ass, because I have to wade through my email getting rid of those fuckers, but some of them are a lot worse than others. I can tolerate the on-line casinos and the Texas-Hold-em sites, because that's at least a step above the gutter, even for a spammer.

But what's with the "wimmen-dog sex" sites that keep popping up? That's just pure sick shit. Do some people REALLY get a thrill from watching wimmen have sex with dogs? Maybe they do because they figure that if a woman will fuck a dog, ANY loser has a chance to get laid. It raises their hopes.

I'll confess... I fellow I worked with for a number of years had a slut of a bulldog and a goat that would screw anything that would hold still. I went over to his house several times and we would sit on his porch, drink beer and watch that goat rape the dog. The dog just laid there and took it, making an occasional "ummph!" sound. I thought it was entertaining as hell.

But I didn't find anything erotic about it. It just beat watching the corn grow.

(UPDATE: Evidently, some people do like sex with dogs. But it does appear from the story that this little pervert didn't cull much.)

Comments

Your so nice Dana... You'd have him shot. Nooooo, I'd let him live, let him beg for the bullet.

Same with that damn spammer; just followed the link from my own comments.

Posted by: Key on June 20, 2005 01:53 PM

We had a 17 year old in my area do the same thing to a dog also. As soon as it hit the rumor mill circuit around our small area, people were breaking out the torches and pitchforks.

I can only hope for some vigilante justice when these bastards get to jail.

Posted by: Chablis on June 20, 2005 02:08 PM

Acidman, you made me laugh for a good 2 minutes with that bulldog and goat story hehe. thank you.

Posted by: Halo on June 20, 2005 03:23 PM

Yeah, whats the point of showing the picture of the boy? Maybe if that was a mistake, something he do once. his life is definetely ruined now. A dogs life is more worth than a boys obviosely. And I realy dont think the dog "suffers" of this, its asshole my hurt a little, and thats bad, but the deep emotianal (hehe "emotiANAL" is that spelled right, im not a native english writer.), suffering, dogs are not capable of.

warthog

Posted by: warthog on June 20, 2005 03:34 PM

Warthog,
Sorry if I'm misunderstanding you, but it sounds like you feel sorry for that useless little piece of shit. He raped a dog and probably two young girls. According to the story one of the girls he's accused of molesting was 3. That isn't a "mistake" that is sick beyond words. Also I believe that dogs feel pain and can suffer even emotionally.

Posted by: bbuddha on June 20, 2005 09:09 PM

Warthog...get off your dog.

Posted by: Chablis on June 20, 2005 09:12 PM

Okay, didnt get that part about the little girls. That makes things a bit different. I am not saying that what he did to the dog was okay either, just that his life will be ruined by getting his pic out for everyone to see. Later on, he might have had a chance to get a job and be a contributor to the society, but now he is forever gonna be a social/criminal case. All because of a dogs hurt feelings.

warthog

Posted by: warthog on June 21, 2005 09:51 AM

Btw, did I mention that I LOVE the fact that the kid's pic is posted all over the internet?

...perhaps someone will have him bend over for a horse.

Posted by: Key on June 21, 2005 10:48 AM

Warthog, again I must implore you to not only leave your poor dog alone, but also please put down the crack pipe that you're smoking.

I'm not sure when the boy ruined his life...when he raped the children or when he raped the dog. But I think it's pretty obvious that his life was over LONG before his picture hit the internet.

Posted by: Chablis on June 21, 2005 12:00 PM

As for the kids he raped, yes then I think it is apprpriate to let the socitey know who he is. If the dog thing was the only thing he did, then I dont think it was a good thing to make him known to the whole world.

Posted by: warthog on June 21, 2005 02:04 PM

Why the hell not? The kid who did it here has his name plastered all over the front pages of our local newspapers and websites and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that as far as I can see. Let him live with the stigma for the rest of his life...the sick bastard deserves it.

Someone can correct me if I'm wrong because I've never done any research on this subject, but wouldn't sex with an animal be considered animal cruelty? And wouldn't it be against the law? Divulging this kid's name and mugshot would be no different than what you see happen to any other criminal in a news story.

Posted by: Chablis on June 21, 2005 05:30 PM

Of course it is animal cruelty. And of course it isnt a good thing to do. But the question is for the society as a whole is it a good thing to put the identity of the criminal in petty cases( so can we argue to hell and back if the dog thing was a petty case) in the media,. The person it is about will be branded for the rest of his life, and maybe choose to live by is reputation instead of working and paying taxes. So in the end it will be you as a taxpaying citisen who has to found the correction fascilities, law enforcment and so on , to keep this person in check. maybe even you have to shoot the bastard because he is standing in your living room stealing your stuff. All because you like to see criminals in the paper.

warthog

Posted by: warthog on June 22, 2005 06:14 AM

I see absolutely nothing wrong with it. We plaster our front pages with mug shots of rapists, robbers, murderers and other animal abusers...why not animal sodomizers too? Makes perfect sense to me. Of course they'll be branded for their whole lives...that's the point.

My very own local sicko can be found
HERE

Posted by: Chablis on June 22, 2005 07:01 AM

About

Search

Links

Tall Dogs

Archives

Extras

Credits

June 20, 2005

spammers