Gut Rumbles

July 18, 2005

quote of the day

I don't need to elaborate on this one.

"Am I the only one who thinks watching the sad spectacle of the Democrats continuing to pimp the deflated Valerie Plame "scandal" is like watching a dog lick its own butt?

Sure, it feels great, but the only one who's excited is the dog."

No, steve h., you're NOT the only one.


A cat wouldn't even get excited licking it's own butt.

Posted by: Ironnerd on July 18, 2005 10:18 PM


Posted by: Blondage on July 18, 2005 11:29 PM

Joins blondage in laughing.

Steve you are definately not alone.

Posted by: Alli on July 19, 2005 12:58 AM


NadaGate indeed!

Posted by: Wes Jackson on July 19, 2005 01:13 AM

At least a dog licking his own butt still has some credibility, unlike these fucking criminals in the White House.


Posted by: PJ on July 19, 2005 03:48 AM

Exposing the cover of a CIA field operative became a federal crime in 1982 after Richard Welch, a CIA station chief in Athens, was assassinated shortly after his cover was exposed in a magazine.

"Even though I'm a tranquil guy now at this stage of my life, I have nothing but contempt and anger for those who betray the trust by exposing the name of our sources. They are, in my view, the most insidious of traitors."
-George H.W. Bush

That quote was in response to the outing of Richard Welch and later Barbara Bush also railed against the way Welch's cover had been blown. But I guess it's different when Karl Rove is the one that is "the most insidious of traitors". Hell, he is a Bush family friend and the one who helped their baby boy become a dictator. The rules are obviously different for hypocritical fucktarded Republicans.


Posted by: PJ on July 19, 2005 04:25 AM

You should know all about butt licking, PJ, and with Hillarys butt to lick, you should be busy for all eternity...........oh gawd, I just fed a troll!!......forgive me A-MAN, I have sinned.

Posted by: James Hooker- "rove for president-'08 on July 19, 2005 04:54 AM

I just wonder if either half of PJ's brain can understand that his internet browser has the ability to take him to visit with all of his fellow kool aid drinking liberal "shit for brains" friends rather than haunting around Acidman's personal bought and paid for website?

He could even start is own blog for free and watch his hitcounter go backwards rather than crossing 2 million.

Hey PJ, Plame wasn't covert since 1997, and the reporters called Rove, not the other way around...

you idiot.

Posted by: Virgil on July 19, 2005 08:20 AM

So many PJs and so little ammunition.

Posted by: james old guy on July 19, 2005 09:21 AM

Virgil, I suspect true idiots wouldn't let PJ into their club either.

Posted by: McGehee on July 19, 2005 10:27 AM

I can udnerstand you would be bored. But, in another life, you also got all excited because bill got a blow job from a willing skank.

This craptard turd blossom outed the identity of a working CIA agent endangering her and anyone known to have been associated with her.

Assholes here complain about 'moral equivalence' in liberal bash-talk. Do you see the moral difference between blow jobs and blow cover of our undercover agents?

I didn't think so. Back to ice tea and cats.

Posted by: Norm on July 19, 2005 01:56 PM

PeeJ, I'm trying to see things from your point of view, but I can't get my head that far up my ass.

Posted by: Alaska Kim on July 19, 2005 02:34 PM

The media themselves argued in court that Valerie Plame was outed more than ten years ago, and that she was later outed again by the CIA itself.

The reactionary Left needs to find another conspiracy theory.

Posted by: McGehee on July 19, 2005 04:01 PM

Back to school McGehee. It's not possible to be reactionary left.

And, if Plame was outed by the CIA itself( a crock)
why did Rove seem to think it would hurt Wilson to do it again?

Shit-for-brains are we?

If you're too stupid to make stuff up that even sound credible, stick with the stuff you can handle--you know, the poopie stuff and sex organ ridicule.

How small is your dick? No really....

Posted by: Dr. Ponce on July 19, 2005 04:41 PM

Mr. McGee,

don't know where you got your info about Cia/Plame
but here's the law:

50 U.S.C. ß 421. Protection of identities of certain United States undercover intelligence officers, agents, informants, and sources.

(a) Disclosure of information by persons having or having had access to classified information that identifies covert agent Whoever, having or having had authorized access to classified information that identifies a covert agent, intentionally discloses any information identifying such covert agent to any individual not authorized to receive classified information, knowing that the information disclosed so identifies such covert agent and that the United States is taking affirmative measures to conceal such covert agentís intelligence relationship to the United States, shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

Posted by: Doug on July 19, 2005 05:09 PM

Of course, the law depends entirely on whether or not Plame was a covert agent.

Which, by the look of things, she wasn't. You can't "out" someone who isn't covert to begin with (which is what this little investigation is trying to clear up). So in the end, it's just another case of BDS run amuk on the meadows of irrelevancy. Ultimately, the one who is coming out looking like a complete schmuck is Wilson himself for wasting taxpayer dollars sitting by the pool and drinking tea.

Ironically, the law in question was created because outing covert agents was something of a cottage industry amongst the left during the 1970s.

Posted by: Chris on July 19, 2005 06:11 PM

Someone owes me a new keyboard!

Posted by: Timothy on July 19, 2005 08:12 PM


You need to read the rest of the ordinance, the part that has the definition of a covert agent. 'Kay?

Posted by: Juliette on July 19, 2005 09:33 PM

From the newspaper today

Ten former CIA agents are livid at the callous treatment of Valeri and will not be silent:

"The disclosure of Ms. Plameís name was a shameful event in American history and, in our professional judgment, may have damaged U.S. national security and poses a threat to the ability of U.S. intelligence gathering using human sources. Any breach of the code of confidentiality and cover weakens the overall fabric of intelligence, and, directly or indirectly, jeopardizes the work and safety of intelligence workers and their sources."..

Posted by: Evelyn on July 19, 2005 09:45 PM

In my considered (fellow cracker ass) opinion, jb needs his own blog too if he wants to fill so much space with so much mindless bullshit.

Hey pj and jb (is that short for blow job, backwards), why not try clicking on ...

Start your own blog. Its free, and everyone that thinks you are a fucking genius will be right there with you..

BOTH of them.

Posted by: Virgil on July 20, 2005 01:46 AM


If Rob does not desire comments, he is free to remove them, your opinion notwithstanding. And even if I were a fucking genius with my own blog, I would permit your inane commentary--complete with the usual juvenile playground references used to deflect attention from your own sexual inadequacies.

In other words--you did respond to what I said, so I guess you agree I am a genius.

You guys are a stitch. Dig a hole, you step in it and blame me.

ok. LOL

Posted by: jb on July 20, 2005 01:39 PM

"I just wonder if either half of PJ's brain can understand that his internet browser has the ability to take him to visit with all of his fellow kool aid drinking liberal "shit for brains" friends rather than haunting around Acidman's personal bought and paid for website?

I didn't realize this was a members only, Republican blog. I just thought it was a bunch of illiterate, backwoods, inbred Georgia hillbillies trying to offer an uneducated slant on world affairs, but now that I know it is a Republican site, it makes much more sense.

He could even start is own blog for free and watch his hitcounter go backwards rather than crossing 2 million."

Acidbrain seems to be blowing off quite a bit lately about his supposed 2 million "visitors", but he knows damn well he is full of crap. He may have 2 million "page hits", but we all know that is mostly from the same ole 25-30 sorry examples of wasted DNA that regularly show up to this site to kiss his lazy, skinny, alcoholic ass every day and night. I personally just like to drop by to remind all you idiot fucktards just how full of shit you are. And if Acidbrain doesn't welcome comments from us "outsiders", then perhaps he should not put his "personal bought and paid for website" on the public Internet. But until he privatizes it, I recommend you shut the fuck up and listen up for much more to come from me whenever I feel the need to reply to assinine comments such as yours Virgil.


Posted by: PJ on July 21, 2005 04:53 AM
Post a comment

*Note: If you are commenting on an older entry, your
comment will not appear until it has been approved.
Do not resubmit it.