Gut Rumbles

June 09, 2003

new troll

They grow like mushrooms in shit, staying in the dark, then pop up out of nowhere to infect somebody's blog like the fungus that they are. I now have attracted the fungus named "Cassidy," who has two extra letters in front of his deserved name.

Wow and to tthink I would end up in your daily bout of stupidity. At first I thought you were some entertaining curmudgeon, A-man, but now I've come to realize that you are one of those ignorant blindly following morons I don't like. (Heh. I would say that I don't like you either, but I prefer to simply ignore your asshoic self. I would appreciate you kissing my ass, however, because you might absorb some sense that way. You need a Vulcan mind-meld and you need to start low and work your way up.) How can you talk about being the "Tall Dog" when your (that would be "you're," you illiterate fuckhead.) so busy staring up Dubya's ass. Lucky for him thier (I hope that is a typo. If it's not, you are COMPLETELY ILLITERATE, asswipe.) is enough ignorant right wing shitheads like you. A lack of education is not a "Republican revolution". (Where did this "lack of education" point come from? Getting dumb people to show up at the polls and fuck up the simple process of voting is a DEMOCRAT problem. Why don't you take a Valium and settle down?)

When has Bush lied, from day one. Where are the WMD's. I don't know WHERE the WMDs that Bill Clinton was wanking about six years ago are, but I think I know where the mass graves are now. They're in Iraq, dickwit. And we're digging children out of the sand over there. You really suck, do you know that?) Where is seperation (That would be SEPARATION, if you could spell, oh wise one.) of church and state. Where is intelligent gun-advocacy legislation (or repealing of the stupid shit). (You can bet your sweet ass on one thing... nothing "intelligent is ever coming out of you.) Truthfully, the shitbag deserter (Lies, proven to be lies over and over, and only trumpeted by fools. Go post this shit at Atrios. He'll love you. I don't. I would rather have Barney Grumble trolling my site.) should be in prison for shirking his duty to his nation when it really needed it. Yes, anyone who didn't have the balls (BALLS? WHAT THE FUCK WOULD YOU KNOW ABOUT BALLS, YOU FUCKING GELDING? You think coming here and spreading shit on my site about a post that had not one goddam thing to do with what you're ranting about is BALLSY? It's pretty much an ASSHOLE thing to do, but it took no balls. If it did, you wouldn't be here.) to serve shouldn't be benefitting off the blood of my brothers. He didn't have the balls as a young pup. He has not earned the right to be the leader of this great country.

I like running a blog. I meet a lot of interesting people and get a LOT of email every day from fascinating folks. I enjoy my hate mail. Sometimes I get pissed off and attack other bloggers. I pitch hissy fits. I am a tempermental guy.

But the person I attack knows who I am and where to reach me if they don't like what I do or say. I don't run around like a goddam ORC and pull Cassidy shit. But I've seen a lot of people like him, and I've noticed something that never varies.

They LOVE Bill Clinton. They BELIEVE Hillary. They HATE George Bush. They DESPISE the United States.

These are three strikes and you're out in my book. What is really strange is that I NEVER see their libertarian or conservative counterparts trolling liberal blogs for the sole purpose of showing their asses. Trolls are 100% liberal asswipes.

What causes that?


I like the italics. Is that some sort of VRWC code?

Posted by: Ravenwood on June 9, 2003 06:04 PM

What causes that?

It's meat. We should stop feeding them meat. The solution is gruel.

Posted by: Mrs. du Toit on June 9, 2003 06:16 PM

No, it's not meat. It's the fact that they're pathetic nutless monkeys -- homonculus sanstesticles patheticii in the zoological jargon.

Posted by: McGehee on June 9, 2003 06:20 PM

So we should set out banana traps?

Posted by: Mrs. du Toit on June 9, 2003 06:37 PM

My troll is none of those, but he's a big puke nonetheless.

Posted by: Jane on June 9, 2003 06:59 PM

I think what causes it is that the better part of them ran down their Mom's crack and ended up as a brown stain on the mattress. (Thank you D.I. Hartman, again.)

Posted by: stevie on June 9, 2003 07:30 PM


Posted by: Trease on June 9, 2003 07:55 PM

Trolls = soundless bytes.

Posted by: quark2 on June 9, 2003 08:10 PM

I try to read the rumbles every day, and thought I missed something. Guess this troll just walked into the party and dropped a turd in the punch bowl. Not too funny but very pathetic.

Anyway, thanks for clearing up my confusion, and I sure hope I didn't misspell anythng.

Posted by: don on June 9, 2003 08:26 PM

Umm, I'm counting FOUR strikes there, buddy.

He can't spell, and you can't count. Seems even to me!


Posted by: Pascale Soleil on June 9, 2003 08:39 PM

As I've stated many times, the reason liberals are trolls is because no one goes to their lameass sites, so they go to conservative and libertarian sites hoping that someone will click on their link.

Nice bitch slap Acidman.

Posted by: Denny Wilson on June 9, 2003 09:01 PM

Pascale has a point there.

Posted by: Marcl on June 9, 2003 09:29 PM

Oh...I have been shamed by the wisdom of Acidman. I shall go home and cry....................................................................................................................Bullshit.
Did it really take you all day to come up with something that only criticises my grammar and spelling. You are pathetic.
No wonder you're a twice divorced bitter old man and only at 50. What an example you set for your children.
I don't love Bill and I will never trust Hillary. But I do hate Dubya and the oligarchal theocracy he wants.
It would be nice to think that the elder generation had actually produced someone with intelligence, but apparently your number was never called.
Unfortunately, I did like reading your blog, but anyone who blindly follows Dippy must not be a person of character and substance. The really funny part is that I'm not a liberal. I'm a realist. Abortion sucks, but it's here, make it safe. Guns are dangerous weapons, but people do have a right to own them. War sucks, but oh well, sometimes they have to happen. Wellfare is flawed, but it is better than apathy. Reality is that certain things are unquestionable truths. Kennedy's are corrupt. Bush's are corrupt. Black and white does exist, just not in the fallacy that most people mistake for morals.

Posted by: Cassidy on June 9, 2003 09:34 PM

I forgot to mention, if I despised this country why would I be in it's Army. Why would I have stayed in. I love what I do and what it stands for and that's why I say what I think. I despise what our society stands for now, not what it used to be.
And Steve-o, it is hard to take you seriously. What are you 15, 16. Go back to your schoolwork.

Posted by: Cassidy on June 9, 2003 10:06 PM

God, I wish I was 16.

What is really hard to take seriously is the military if they allow utter morons like you to serve. Do they not have ANY kind of screening process these days?

You really should shut the fuck up, before you get fragged by someone in your company. You're casting a horrid shadow over your fellow soldiers.

Better yet-why don't you request they send your stupid ass to Iraq-since you know EVERYTHING- then maybe you could stop a bullet from killing someone worthwhile.

Posted by: stevie on June 9, 2003 10:40 PM


v.,n. 2. An individual who chronically trolls in sense one regularly posts specious arguments, flames or personal attacks to a
newsgroup, discussion list, or in email for no other purpose than to annoy someone or disrupt a discussion. Trolls are recognizable by the fact that the have no real interest in learning about the topic at hand - they simply want to utter flame bait. Like the ugly creatures they are named after, they exhibit no redeeming characteristics, and as such, they are recognized as a lower form of
life on the net, as in, "Oh, ignore him, he's just a troll." Probably so-called because it involves lurking in dark cavelike corners.

Posted by: Sassy on June 9, 2003 10:54 PM


Why is it that I am skeptical of your being in the military? I guess you didn't get the loyalty oath that you signed when you joined the "Army". I guess you have a different Commander in Chief than the rest of us.You have just defined the word "liberal/leftist" which is: unhappy and I'll make sure everyone else is, too. Good Lord, man, go take a happy pill.

Now drink your Bitter Beer and keep wallowing.


Posted by: NavySEAL on June 10, 2003 02:35 AM

Well, Steve, I did try to go. Once done with school, I reclassed to be a Medic, I got sent to a pogue unit instead of a combat unit. Believe me, I'm absolutely miserable. The only units that went over from here are slice units, what's called PROFIS, and they only sent the nurses and more specialized medical personnel. By PCSing to Korea, I missed Operation Anaconda. My old crew were the first conventional troops to go in. I've got friends with Purple Hearts right now.
And yes Navy, I did take my oath. I do my job. I fullfill my duties. I follow my orders. But I don't have to like the shitheads at the top. They haven't earned it. And it is sad that the American people think that they were the best for the job.
What's really funny is that this started because I criticised Bush. OH GOD, I must be unpatriotic. I didn't say I liked clinton or Hillary or what not. I did say I thought he was a better president. I don't like the guy. He's corrupt. And he's just as much a liar as Clinton. At least when Clinton lied, he was only getting a blowjob.
And the 2nd A argument...I actually learned quite a bit. I'm part way through Kim du Toit's writings on gun control. The jury is still out because I haven't finished, but I like his honesty. He says what he thinks without resorting to sophmoric name calling, something we have all managed to do here. So before you label me as liberal or intolerant, think about the reaction that started this shit. I just said what I thought and moved on to the next posting, 'cause this site does tend to be entertaining most times.
And lastly, I am angry. Our society has degenerated into something loathsome. No one looks at the big picture anymore. In my father's era, a man could be an independant, tough, and assertive individual and still fill compassion towards his neighbors. You can be free and still care, and our current slate of reps do not want that. The nazis want you to stop giving a shit and the scared tree-huggers want you to hand them money so that only they could give a shit. And the vast majority of America is buying this bullshit.
And Steve, the screening process is allowing young pups with thier "give me" attitudes that thier parents have taught them. We are getting more middle class kids who think the Army owes them something when they haven't even finished Basic. I'm a damn fine soldier. I am very good at what I did and what I do now. Somone like you can't insult that, 'cause you'll never get it. You'll never go to another country and see what people look like who are just happy with thier basic freedoms. And then come back home to this? It is sad.

Posted by: Cassidy on June 10, 2003 06:21 AM

I don't know if you are really in the military or not, but if you are then your comments here are a violation of DOD Directive 1344.10

E3.3.11. Use contemptuous words against the officeholders
described in 10 U.S.C. 888 (reference (b)), or participate
in activities proscribed by DoD Directives 5200.2 and
1325.6 (references (c) and (d)).

10 U.S.C. 888 lists the following officeholders: President, the Vice President, Congress, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, the Secretary of Transportation, or the Governor or legislature of any State, Territory, Commonwealth, or possession in which the military member is on duty).

Violators of this directive can be punished through article 92 of the UCMJ-Failure to obey order or regulation .

You are in direct violation of this directive. I would suggest you cease and desist your attacks on your commander in chief. You may not like him, but if you are in the military you are required to give him respect. I would suggest you keep your criticisms private.

Posted by: Yosemite Sam on June 10, 2003 09:07 AM

--And yes Navy, I did take my oath. I do my job. I fullfill my duties. I follow my orders.

No you are not following your orders as my post above makes abundantly clear.

Posted by: Yosemite Sam on June 10, 2003 09:12 AM

That's rather hypocritical considering you treatment of Clinton. And just who would be making that suggestion? Are you not required to give the president of your chosen country respect as well. He was elected just as properly. That's a cop out and you know it. And yes I am in the military. Don't threaten me with laws just because I don't agree with you. What are you going to do, threaten to beat me up next time.

Posted by: Cassidy on June 10, 2003 09:15 AM

--That's rather hypocritical considering you treatment of Clinton.
What treatment of Clinton. The only thing I have said is:
--because the Clinton administration would not allow heavy armor to back up our troops.

Notice no vitriol or name calling unlike what you have been writing in your comments. BTW, since I am no longer serving in the military, Directive 1344.10 no longer applies to me. But when I did serve, I acted with respect to the then current Commander in Chief whether I agreed or disagreed with him.

--Don't threaten me with laws just because I don't agree with you.
No threat, I am just pointing out that you are disobeying lawful orders and are acting in an extremely unprofessional manner.
You stated you obey orders and as I have shown, you most certainly do not.

Posted by: Yosemite Sam on June 10, 2003 09:34 AM

I'm envious. I've been running my blog for four weeks and haven't gotten one hate-mail yet.

Posted by: Kevin Baker on June 10, 2003 10:04 AM

Somehow I do not believe that you never had unkind word to say about Clinton while you were serving..
Awright, I'll give you this one. We all have our little lapses of discipline. Mine is that I can't keep my contempt bottled up. " Looks like shit, acts like shit, smells like shit...must be shit". I'm sure your familiar with something like that Sam. At least my lapses of discipline don't include my physical fitness, my devotion and loyalty to my people, and the fact that I've never been or thought of going AWOL or deserting. You can think what you want as far as "professionalism", but, ask my old crew and they were secure enough in my professionalism to follow where I would lead them.

Posted by: Cassidy on June 10, 2003 10:08 AM

Again, show me anything in my statements that I hated Clinton. You won't find it. Again, it doesn't matter whether you like or dislike the Commander in Chief. But, as a member of the military, it is your DUTY to obey and act with respect towards him. You cannot pick and choose which orders to follow. You are required to follow all of them.

Posted by: Yosemite Sam on June 10, 2003 10:21 AM

Ditto Sam... in a previous flame, the troll stated he proudly quit the military because of the way his poor wife was harrassed, in what military did spouses become G.I. ? When I called him on it... he dddid a dddouble take, and stated he still serves (where in the latrine?) and he trashed the reserve forces. Any pea brain wouldn't trash the numbers of reserves being called to duty in this decade. It's quickly moving towards an 80/20 split. Which is the DoD goal. They are well trained in the reserves and bring along the added expertise of thier civilan careers.

I know many Seabees who build houses during the week, schools, as weekend warriors, and bridges, command posts, and POW camps when duty calls. All with the support of spouses who do not whine or spend welfare.

I know many others who serve in law enforcement during the week, various sundry duties as weekend warriors, and a slappy-happy year at Gitmo when duty called. Thier non-whining supportive spouses dutifully took care of the families and mortgages until they returned.

Troll flamer, doesn't want a response, just to read his plagerized ego online.

Interesting to discover so many fellow servicemembers online, HOOAH

Posted by: Sassy on June 10, 2003 10:31 AM

I quit using WIC, Slappy. I reenlisted last year. Pull your head out of your fourth point of contact long enough to read, as opposed to skimming.

Yes, I trashed the reserves and NG. I've had the unfortunate experience of wondering if they were going to shoot me during training. And I've seen examples of your wonderfull, civilians doing thier duty on gate guard with the beer bellies and the goatees and the rusty weapons, etc...

Sam, your right. I am wrong for trashing the president. I will admit that. I don't apologise for it. I say what I mean. "Looks like shit, acts like shit, smells like shit...must be shit." I still get the job done.
nd Slappy, I quit using WIC because of how my wife was treated when she went up thier every few months, so that we could afford formula for our kids. She has never whined and complained and has done a helluva job as an Army wife. She has a great deal more class than you, or me for that matter. For all of my anger and and growing intolerance with people, we can say what we want to each other, but now you have chosen, in my eyes, to attack someone who was not part of this debate. Now that is low, and an "asshole thing to do". Nothing plagarized about my ego, Slapnuts. It's been born and raised on its own through hopefull idealism to bitter disgust all on its very own.

Posted by: Cassidy on June 10, 2003 10:53 AM

I did not label you as anything other than what you've proved yourself to be: Fundamentally STUPID....My name is NOT STEVE or STEVE-O. You can't even get a name right and it's beyond obvious that you do not know the difference between men, women and maggots. (Hint-YOU are a maggot. There. A label.)
Illiterate-you can't spell the simplest words and you've obviously never even heard of proper punctuation.
Asshole-every time you puke your rhetoric, you prove that.
And, the reason our society has degenerated into something less than tolerable is because of cretins like you. Want to help the military AND the society of this country? Get out of the military and go to one of those countries where people LOOK happier with their freedoms.
You, of all people, should be glad the military is so lax in who they allow in. You got in. God forbid they don't make allowances for people with I.Q.'s equal to room temperature.
Out here, someone would take your pecksniffian, pusillanimous, pansy ass into a first grade classroom where you'd be taught how to spell and use punctuation, then into a dark alley where they'd beat the rest of the sense into you that your parents so obviously failed to instill.
If you REALLY want to help this country, shut off your computer and go get yourself sterilized, you whiny, uninformed, over-indulged pissant.

Posted by: stevie on June 10, 2003 02:22 PM

Yosemite, Sassy, Myself, et al,
Why are we all wasting our own time and Acidman's bandwidth on this stupid drone?
If we all give his mindless drivel the attention it deserves-which is NONE-he may just crawl back under his rock. If not, he'll be arguing with no one but himself. Hell, maybe Acidman will get sick enough of him to block his ISP altogether.
I, for one, am through with this flaming asshole. I don't care what his opinions are of me, this country, Acidman, God, the President....or even dogshit. ( Which should be pretty high, since that is what he primarily consists of.)
We are not going to be able to help this fool. He is more interested in controversy than compromise.
It's a proven fact that children would rather have negative attention than no attention at all. And, I am sick of having a battle of wits with an unarmed fucktard.
I will be using my time more constructively by praying for our military and the REAL soldiers because it's blatantly obvious they're gonna need it with dickheads like him to deal with within their own ranks.
Does the military really not do anything about people like this? Don't they know he should be in a psych ward? Or dishonorably discharged? Isn't there some way to make his superiors aware of him? Somewhere to forward all his ridiculous posts so they KNOW who or what they're dealing with?
I'll bet they'd be VERY interested.....

Posted by: stevie on June 10, 2003 02:52 PM

Wow, more regurgitated drivel from Steve. Funny opinion from someone who isn't in. You can say what you want about my beliefs. I have an opinion. I said something and got attacked for it. All of a sudden it is an "asshole thing to do" to respond in kind. Oh well, typical tactic from people like you. Can't even take the time to have a dialogue and immediately attack those you don't agree with. I'm always willing to be open-minded, as per the aformentioned gun debate. I came away with a new set of ideas to check into. It was very interesting.
And once again, if the only thing you can criticise is some lapses in grammar and spelling, then you really don't have much too say. I would say you have set your standards of behavior really low if you look up to A-man. Your significant other must have it very easy when acting like Al Bundy would be a class act to you.
Sam, once again you're right. I shouldn't say what I do. But like many of my peers, I'm only doing what so many people like you did when Clinton was in office. It's a hypocritical stance. Did you say antything to your peers when they attacked him. Probably not. You don't like him, so the rules don't apply. You like Bush, so suddenly its"section, blah, blah,blah."
And Stevie, just for good measure, the IQ is considerably higher than you would assume. I'm not joining MENSA anytime soon, but I'm definately smarter than the average American. I realize that doesn't mean a great deal with you lumped in that category (the averages, most definately not the MENSA).
But hey , overall. I'm bored now. You've hurt my brain Steve-o. So much sludge from one small brain just gets to be too much by the end of the day.

Posted by: Cassidy on June 10, 2003 04:11 PM

---I'm only doing what so many people like you did when Clinton was in office. It's a hypocritical stance. Did you say antything to your peers when they attacked him. Probably not. You don't like him, so the rules don't apply. You like Bush, so suddenly its"section, blah, blah,blah."

I was done with this conversation, but then you again try to put words in my mouth. Where did I say I hated Clinton. Where did I say I didn't like him. I said no such thing. To be honest, I didn't have much of an opinion about him while I was in the service. I left the military early on in his presidency and I can't honestly remember too much of anything being said against him.
If you really want do be treated fairly then treat others fairly. I've been on the whole civil with you, even though I have taken umbrage with your words attacking the Commander in Chief.

Posted by: Yosemite Sam on June 10, 2003 04:41 PM

Yosemite-isn't it obvious to you yet that this illiterate dingleberry doesn't actually READ these posts? Hell, he TRIED dragging Anton into this cesspool and Anton never even addressed him at all. Once we decide to say to hell with him and he knows it, he's going to try even harder to get a response.
Ignore him, Sweetie. He's not worth the bandwidth or attention.

Posted by: stevie on June 10, 2003 05:09 PM

Shit, Rob, you should send him a bill for at least half your monthly webspace fee. He's used it all up right here in this comment box.

Meanwhile, I'll rustle up a dictionary. Christmas comes a bit soon in the cASSidy household....


Posted by: Joni on June 10, 2003 06:46 PM

mugu mugu mugu mugu mugu keep offfffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff ffff offffffffffffffffffffffffffffff

Posted by: muguik on November 1, 2003 10:32 AM
Post a comment