![]() ![]() |
  |
June 17, 2003I think he was pissedMan, it's just a good thing that this guy didn't have a gun. I believe he was angry enough to shoot somebody. Police said that the man, identified only as Peter, followed the suspects through a neighborhood and eventually caught up with them. He then rolled his Hummer over their car. In this case, the goblins might have been better off if the guy was shooting at them. He might have missed. Comments
If we criminalize Hummers, only criminals will have Hummers. Posted by: Juliette on June 17, 2003 05:18 PMHey, I LIVE in Arizona. How did you find out about this before I did? Oh, and the informal poll is running 85% against the store owner being charged. I'd like to be on THAT grand jury! Posted by: Kevin Baker on June 17, 2003 05:26 PMDon't you just love stories with happy endings? Kevin, I don't believe that ANY jury in your state will press charges against that man. Hell, you people are too much like red-necked Georgians. We would pin a medal on his chest and help pay for his Hummer repairs. Posted by: Acidman on June 17, 2003 05:58 PMNow you know why the Bush Administration eased the rules on businesses buying expensive SUV's for "business purposes". It's just so much easier to license a Hummer than it is a Colt M1911. Posted by: Ralph Gizzip on June 17, 2003 08:49 PMCool story. As soon as I quit laughing, I voted "NO" on the "should the Hummer driver be charged" survey. I wish the world was set up to run this way more often. I don't consider that to have "poetic justice", either. It was just plain justice. It's a wonderful example of my #1 creed-"Fuck me? No, fuck YOU..." And then some. Posted by: stevie on June 17, 2003 08:56 PMKevin: I live in New York, and I found out before both of you. ;) Posted by: Mr. Lion on June 17, 2003 09:56 PMLMAO! Post a comment
|
All content © Rob Smith
|